Systematic reviews remain a cornerstone of evidence‐based research, providing comprehensive syntheses of primary study findings to support clinical and policy decision-making. Central to the integrity ...

Systematic reviews are fundamental to the appraisal and synthesis of evidence in health and social care. They utilise pre‐defined protocols to gather, evaluate and integrate findings from diverse ...

Anil Oza is a general assignment reporter at STAT focused on the NIH and health equity. You can reach him on Signal at aniloza.16. Systematic reviews, which involve pooling data from multiple studies ...

Systematic reviews can help to justify a new randomized clinical trial (RCT), inform its design and interpret its results in the context of prior evidence. Therefore, the citation of systematic ...

Introduction Previous reviews have investigated the relationship between empathy and burnout. However, these are now out of date, did not capture the effect of the pandemic, did not include healthcare ...

What is the difference between a systematic literature review and a meta-analysis? A systematic literature review seeks to gather and synthesise all relevant data, whether clinical or non-clinical, ...

Objective To synthesise data on the associations between cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and health in children and adolescents, evaluate the certainty of evidence and identify knowledge gaps. Design ...

On this page you can find information about our systematic literature reviews service, and resources and information to support you in getting started with different types of reviews. The systematic ...

Objective To synthesise the evidence on the effects of physical activity on symptoms of depression, anxiety and psychological distress in adult populations. Design Umbrella review. Data sources Twelve ...